Pages: (2) [1] 2  ( Go to first unread post )

 Workers in South Africa go on strike
Murkyhumor
Posted: Jul 8 2009, 05:09 PM


Nobody gets my humor


Group: Members
Posts: 37
Member No.: 14
Joined: 7-July 09



QUOTE
JOHANNESBURG -- South African construction workers went on an indefinite strike Wednesday at stadiums being built for the 2010 World Cup -- a move that could derail Africa's historic first World Cup tournament.

Thousands of workers at stadiums across the country put down their tools after wage negotiations deadlocked earlier this week. Workers are demanding a 13 percent pay increase while employers are offering 10.4 percent.

The strike could delay completion of flagship projects such as the Soccer City stadium in Johannesburg and stadiums in Cape Town and Durban. Other stadiums in smaller towns have also been affected.

The venues need to be completed by December to meet deadlines set by the game's ruling body FIFA before the tournament kicks off in June 2010.

Lesiba Seshoka of the National Union of Mineworkers, which represents construction workers, said 70,000 workers were involved in the strike, which would continue until employers met their demands.

He said the union was not worried about the completion of the stadiums -- that was a concern of the tournament's local organizing committee.

"We are worried about our families getting food, not a rich man buying a ticket to watch a game," he said.

Joe Campanella, from the South African Federation of Civil Engineering Contractors, which represents construction companies, said only 11,000 workers took part in the strike.

He has said the deal offered by employers amounts to a 65 percent increase, including benefits.

However, the unions have complained that some workers are earning about $1.50 an hour and others $5 a week. Workers in South Africa are supposed to earn a minimum wage of about $200 a month.

The strike has been criticized for jeopardizing South Africa's chances of hosting a successful World Cup -- a monthlong event avidly watched by hundreds of millions around the world.

But the Congress of South African Trade Unions, which represents the country's largest trade union federations, has come out in support of the construction workers and says the dispute is not targeted at the World Cup.

"COSATU, and the construction workers, are as passionate about the 2010 World Cup as anyone, and will do everything possible to ensure its success. But we will not tolerate the stadiums being built by workers who are underpaid or working in dangerous or unhealthy conditions," the organization said in a statement.

Danny Jordaan, chief executive of the local organizing committee, said the strike would soon be resolved and was confident the stadiums will be completed on schedule.

"The construction workers have been the lifeblood of the 2010 FIFA World Cup project. Their hard work has ensured that we are on track to meet our deadlines and that our stadiums will be among the best in the world next year," he said in a statement.

Patrick Geqeza, a shop steward at the Soccer City stadium in Johannesburg, said he understood the importance of having the World Cup in South Africa and completing the stadiums in time.

"We feel bad about going on strike," he said, but added there was little alternative.


Yeesh, i'd be striking on those wages too, talk about paltry. This is most likely going to be cleared up before the world cup, but what alternative venues would it move to if it doesn't? I remember a quote from somewhere from a US official bragging about how we only needed a few days notice to host any tournament.


--------------------
user posted image Seattle bandwagon supporter since 2009!
Top
aggiefan6
Posted: Jul 8 2009, 08:52 PM


Conference


Group: Members
Posts: 20
Member No.: 8
Joined: 7-July 09



yeah, the wages are ish and they deserve better. The world will be looking at South Africa, and they know it so they will give the workers what they want.

I have heard those rumors about how it could come here if something didn't work out, but at this point, I doubt it moves. That would be ridiculous in terms of logistics. what with tickets already sold.

But..i would love to see it come here! i want to see some soccer!


--------------------
Top
AJ1993
Posted: Jul 8 2009, 09:07 PM


Couch Potato


Group: Members
Posts: 84
Member No.: 17
Joined: 8-July 09



WORLD CUP 2010 in... smiley-flag005.gif ENGLAND!


--------------------
MY RESPECT CAMPAIGN (Teams I don't support but I respect):
Newcastle United
Chester City
Rubin Kazan
FC Union Berlin
Dynamos (Zimbabwe)
Hannover 96


NO RESPECT CAMPAIGN (Teams that I'd have to be dead to support):
Arsenal
Liverpool
Barcelona
Top
MFUSA
Posted: Jul 9 2009, 05:55 AM


The "Serious" One


Group: Moderator
Posts: 80
Member No.: 3
Joined: 6-July 09



The blogging community is falling over themselves to report this because of the implications, but I'm hesitant-while it's definitely news, I can't see the tournament being moved at this point.

And as much as I would love a World Cup in the US before 2022 (when I'm guessing we'll get it), I having the feeling that hosting without a decent run up wouldn't really be a good thing.


--------------------
Match Fit USA Examining the State of American Soccer
MFUSA on Twitter AmSoc on iTunes
Top
MJ_in_Pitt
Posted: Jul 9 2009, 10:56 AM


Championship


Group: WUR Panelist
Posts: 119
Member No.: 12
Joined: 7-July 09



This whole thing is just a big marketing ploy for "District 9" I'm pretty sure!

Seriously though, I can't see them moving the Cup at this point. The stadia will get finished just like they did for the Olympics in Greece. If there is really something to be concerned about it should just be the general infrastructure of South Africa.
Top
MJ_in_Pitt
Posted: Jul 9 2009, 12:06 PM


Championship


Group: WUR Panelist
Posts: 119
Member No.: 12
Joined: 7-July 09



QUOTE (MFUSA @ Jul 9 2009, 05:55 AM)
The blogging community is falling over themselves to report this because of the implications, but I'm hesitant-while it's definitely news, I can't see the tournament being moved at this point.

And as much as I would love a World Cup in the US before 2022 (when I'm guessing we'll get it), I having the feeling that hosting without a decent run up wouldn't really be a good thing.

I've reached out to someone I know in South Africa. Should be an interesting response.
Top
MFUSA
Posted: Jul 9 2009, 01:04 PM


The "Serious" One


Group: Moderator
Posts: 80
Member No.: 3
Joined: 6-July 09



I decided to write an opinion on the possibility of the US being a contingency option...

http://www.matchfitusa.com/2009/07/us-as-w...ck-opinion.html


--------------------
Match Fit USA Examining the State of American Soccer
MFUSA on Twitter AmSoc on iTunes
Top
Murkyhumor
Posted: Jul 9 2009, 05:49 PM


Nobody gets my humor


Group: Members
Posts: 37
Member No.: 14
Joined: 7-July 09



It was never a serious thought that it would be moved to me, I'm sure FIFA would do everything it can to keep it in South Africa. The US speculation was just idle fancy on my part.

Nevertheless, good read, thanks for the article.

ps. If it does move to England, wouldn't that increase our chances in 2018? From reading This article it seems that 2022 is more likely for the US at this point. (again, this is idle speculation)


--------------------
user posted image Seattle bandwagon supporter since 2009!
Top
Ginge
Posted: Jul 15 2009, 09:04 AM


Oh No, Not Again.


Group: Admin
Posts: 222
Member No.: 2
Joined: 6-July 09



Seems the strike is over. LINK

Guess that means we all get suffer through another tournament with those blasted vuvuzelas next summer.


--------------------
Top
THE SCOTT
Posted: Jul 15 2009, 10:11 AM


Haz Lil' T-Rex Arms


Group: Admin
Posts: 177
Member No.: 6
Joined: 7-July 09



QUOTE (Ginge @ Jul 15 2009, 09:04 AM)
Seems the strike is over. LINK

Guess that means we all get suffer through another tournament with those blasted vuvuzelas next summer.

We can pretend its not over for WUR tonight though........


--------------------
Top
aggiefan6
Posted: Jul 15 2009, 02:14 PM


Conference


Group: Members
Posts: 20
Member No.: 8
Joined: 7-July 09



who's on WUR tonight?

and yay for south africa! way to pay your workers!



--------------------
Top
Ginge
Posted: Jul 15 2009, 02:32 PM


Oh No, Not Again.


Group: Admin
Posts: 222
Member No.: 2
Joined: 6-July 09



QUOTE (aggiefan6 @ Jul 15 2009, 03:14 PM)
who's on WUR tonight?

Me, Sandra and a Super Special Mystery Guest!


--------------------
Top
SirHenry
Posted: Jul 16 2009, 07:09 AM


A Knight of Highbury


Group: Members
Posts: 143
Member No.: 25
Joined: 13-July 09



QUOTE (Ginge @ Jul 15 2009, 02:32 PM)
QUOTE (aggiefan6 @ Jul 15 2009, 03:14 PM)
who's on WUR tonight?

Me, Sandra and a Super Special Mystery Guest!

Who could it be?

Mork???


tongue.gif tongue.gif tongue.gif tongue.gif


--------------------
A Dragon in a Bunny suit is still a Dragon...
Top
Twiggster
Posted: Jul 17 2009, 03:14 PM


Sandras Secret Yorkshire Fantasy (!)


Group: Members
Posts: 232
Member No.: 27
Joined: 17-July 09



QUOTE (Ginge @ Jul 15 2009, 05:04 PM)
Seems the strike is over. LINK

Guess that means we all get suffer through another tournament with those blasted vuvuzelas next summer.

Fraid so: BZZZZZ = BOOOOOO

For fukksakes! angry.gif This is going to be the worst W.Cup EVER! ranting.gif


--------------------
user posted image
Top
MFUSA
Posted: Jul 17 2009, 07:24 PM


The "Serious" One


Group: Moderator
Posts: 80
Member No.: 3
Joined: 6-July 09



I hate them, but I think I'll just start tuning them out after awhile, like I did during the Confed Cup.

Crowds will be bigger though, so maybe it will be maddening.

But hey, at least the Yanks have a leg up on most because we're used to them now.

smiley-flag-static-002.gif


--------------------
Match Fit USA Examining the State of American Soccer
MFUSA on Twitter AmSoc on iTunes
Top
« Next Oldest | Road to the World Cup 2010 | Next Newest »

Topic OptionsPages: (2) [1] 2 



Hosted for free by InvisionFree (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.2358 seconds | Archive